Taco Time Architecture |
| I would offer another opinion about the Taco Time. It's a great example of how "site plan trumps architecture"--but not entirely.
The basic site plan is good: it more-or-less follows "The Three Rules." But the mirrored-glass (violating one of the Rules' coda) prevents the permeability/transparency which a building needs if it is to be urban. If the owners replace the mirrored-glass with "see-through" glass (what a funny idea!) the building would have a totally-different impact on the street. Furthermore, where I differ from Hinshaw slightly is in his apparent stress in this article on the appearance of buildings. The point needs to be made over-and-over again-and it was Hinshaw himself who first led me to understand this-that urban design rules are NOT aesthetic so much as behavioral i.e. we want the design of buildings to encourage a different civic experience and human behavior on the street. Because of its mirrored-glass, the Taco Time is a good example of "almost but not quite." |
| ©1999 City Comforts Inc. |